Skip to content
  • Officer Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench at a hearing...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Officer Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench at a hearing Aug. 4, 2016, at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke attends a hearing in...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke attends a hearing in front of Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on March 23, 2017. An indictment was filed Thursday for 16 counts of aggrevated battery with a firearm.

  • Special prosecutor Joseph McMahon argues that the conversations between Chicago...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Special prosecutor Joseph McMahon argues that the conversations between Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke and Fraternal Order of Police representatives at the scene of the shooting of Laquan McDonald should not be privileged, during a hearing on Aug. 11, 2017.

  • Followed out by a handful of shouting protesters, Chicago police...

    Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune

    Followed out by a handful of shouting protesters, Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke leaves the Leighton Criminal Court Building following his hearing Dec. 18, 2015.

  • Chicago city Attorney Lisette Mojica, second from right, answers questions...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago city Attorney Lisette Mojica, second from right, answers questions from Judge Vincent Gaughan on March 23, 2017, while standing with defense attorney Dan Herbert, left, and defendant Jason Van Dyke, right, in the Laquan McDonald shooting case.

  • Kane County State's Attorney Joseph McMahon, left, is sworn in...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Kane County State's Attorney Joseph McMahon, left, is sworn in by Judge Vincent Gaughan as the independent attorney to prosecute Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke during a hearing Aug. 4, 2016, at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago.

  • Jason Van Dyke, left, leaves the Cook County Jail at...

    Phil Velasquez / Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke, left, leaves the Cook County Jail at 27th Street and California Avenue on Nov. 30, 2015, after posting bond.

  • Kane County State's Attorney Joseph McMahon leaves the hearing Aug....

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Kane County State's Attorney Joseph McMahon leaves the hearing Aug. 4, 2016, at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago. He was sworn in as the independent attorney to prosecute Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke.

  • Former Fraternal Order of Police representative Kriston Kato, who spoke...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Former Fraternal Order of Police representative Kriston Kato, who spoke with Jason Van Dyke at the scene of the Laquan McDonald shooting, testifies in court on Aug. 11, 2017.

  • Former Fraternal Order of Police spokesman Pat Camden enters court...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Former Fraternal Order of Police spokesman Pat Camden enters court Aug. 11, 2017, to testify about the night that Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke fatally shot Laquan McDonald.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, right, attends a court...

    Zbigniew Bzdak / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, right, attends a court hearing with his attorney, Daniel Herbert, on Dec. 18, 2015, at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago. Van Dyke is charged with first-degree murder in the 2014 fatal shooting of Laquan McDonald, 17, while Van Dyke was on duty.

  • Special prosecutor Joseph McMahon, center, and defense attorney Dan Herbert,...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Special prosecutor Joseph McMahon, center, and defense attorney Dan Herbert, right, stand in front of the judge at a hearing for Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on March 23, 2017.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke leaves the Leighton Criminal...

    Jose M. Osorio / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke leaves the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago following a court appearance May 5, 2016.

  • Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench in a hearing on...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench in a hearing on his case. Former police officer Jason Van Dyke who is indicted for 1st degree murder in the shooting of Laquan McDonald is presided by Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Courts Building Thursday April 20, 2017.

  • Attorney Daniel Herbert, left, who represents Officer Jason Van Dyke....

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Attorney Daniel Herbert, left, who represents Officer Jason Van Dyke. right, addresses Judge Vincent Gaughan during a hearing on Jan. 10, 2017.

  • Jason Van Dyke, center in black hoodie, leaves the Cook...

    Michael Tercha/Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke, center in black hoodie, leaves the Cook County Jail at 27th Street and California Avenue on Nov. 30, 2015, after posting bond.

  • Officer Jason Van Dyke, middle, leaves the Leighton Criminal Court...

    Jose M. Osorio / Chicago Tribune

    Officer Jason Van Dyke, middle, leaves the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago following a court appearance and heads to a vehicle May 5, 2016.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke arrives at the Leighton...

    Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke arrives at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on Nov. 24, 2015, to face charges in the shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald.

  • Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke, center, is guarded by...

    Alyssa Pointer / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke, center, is guarded by Cook County Sheriffs Officers as he leave Leighton Criminal Courthouse after a court appearance on May 25, 2017. Jason Van Dyke was charged with shooting and killing Laquan McDonald, a 16-year-old African American man, sixteen times in 2014.

  • Special Prosecutors Joseph Cullen, from left, Joseph McMahon and Defense...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Special Prosecutors Joseph Cullen, from left, Joseph McMahon and Defense Attorney Daniel Herbert with defendant Jason Van Dyke, right. The defense attorneys for Jason Van Dyke unsuccessfully argued that first degree murder charges should be dropped against their client during a hearing at the George Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago May 26, 2017.

  • Officer Jason Van Dyke, center, with his attorney Daniel Herbert,...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Officer Jason Van Dyke, center, with his attorney Daniel Herbert, second from left, attends a hearing at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on Jan. 10, 2017, with Judge Vincent Gaughan presiding.

  • Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench for his hearing with...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench for his hearing with Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on Jan. 10, 2017.

  • Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench in a hearing on...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench in a hearing on his case. Former police officer Jason Van Dyke who is indicted for 1st degree murder in the shooting of Laquan McDonald is presided by Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Courts Building Thursday April 20, 2017.

  • Defense attorney Steven "Randy" Rueckert pleads with Judge Vincent Gaughan...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Defense attorney Steven "Randy" Rueckert pleads with Judge Vincent Gaughan while trying to argue that Jason Van Dyke's conversations on the scene of the Laquan McDonald shooting were private, Aug. 11, 2017.

  • Steven "Randy" Rueckert, left, and Daniel Herbert, attorneys for Jason...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Steven "Randy" Rueckert, left, and Daniel Herbert, attorneys for Jason Van Dyke, confer with Van Dyke during court Aug. 11, 2017. Van Dyke was at the Leighton Criminal Courts Building in Chicago for a hearing on the shooting of Laquan McDonald.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, right, confers with his...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, right, confers with his attorney, Dan Herbert, as they attend a hearing in front of Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on March 23, 2017.

  • Jason Van Dyke stands in front of Judge Vincent Gaughan...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Jason Van Dyke stands in front of Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Court Building on Aug. 4, 2016 in Chicago. Kane County State's Attorney Joseph McMahon was sworn in as the independent attorney to prosecute Van Dyke.

  • Followed out by a handful of shouting protesters, Chicago police...

    Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune

    Followed out by a handful of shouting protesters, Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke leaves the Leighton Criminal Court Building following his hearing Dec. 18, 2015. Van Dyke is charged with first-degree murder in the shooting of Laquan McDonald.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, center, with his attorney...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke, center, with his attorney Dan Herbert, third from left, attends a hearing in front of Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago on March 23, 2017, in the shooting death of Laquan McDonald.

  • Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke arrives Dec. 29, 2015, for...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke arrives Dec. 29, 2015, for his arraignment at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago.

  • Daniel Herbert argues against the first-degree murder charges. The defense...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    Daniel Herbert argues against the first-degree murder charges. The defense attorneys for Jason Van Dyke unsuccessfully argued that first degree murder charges should be dropped against their client during a hearing at the George Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago May 26, 2017.

  • From left, Assistant State's Attorney Lynn McCarthy, defense Attorney Dan Herbert,...

    Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune

    From left, Assistant State's Attorney Lynn McCarthy, defense Attorney Dan Herbert, Jason Van Dyke and defense Attorney Randy Rueckert stand before Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Courts Building in Chicago on May 5, 2016.

of

Expand
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Four suspended Chicago police officers under investigation for their roles in the Laquan McDonald shooting will be put back on the department payroll before the probe is complete after the city’s police board on Monday delayed disciplinary proceedings.

Chicago Police Board Hearing Officer Tom Johnson announced that the disciplinary proceedings would be delayed until the completion of the criminal trial for a fifth officer in the case, Jason Van Dyke. Van Dyke has been suspended without pay since November 2015, when he was charged with murder for killing McDonald, a 17-year-old who was shot 16 times as he held a knife.

The four other officers — Daphne Sebastian, Janet Mondragon, Ricardo Viramontes and Sgt. Stephen Franko — have been suspended without pay since last summer. Like Van Dyke, they face being fired over allegations they covered up the investigation of McDonald’s death by making and approving statements in police reports that were contradicted by video footage of the shooting.

While Van Dyke cannot return to duty because of his lingering criminal charges, Johnson’s decision Monday afternoon will allow the others to go back to work.

Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said in a statement Monday evening that he stands by his original recommendation that the officers be fired. He said the four officers, however, will be relieved of their police powers and be assigned to desk duty.

“While legally the ruling leaves us with no other short-term options, the officers’ police powers will remain suspended and they will not return to the street,” Johnson said in the statement.

It’s unclear whether the four officers will be compensated for all the money they were not paid since last summer.

Hearing Officer Tom Johnson said Monday that the disciplinary proceedings by the police board would “prejudice and potentially jeopardize the criminal prosecutions and the officers’ constitutional rights.”

In its 14-page decision, the board said the Police Department could be violating the constitutional rights of the four officers if they continued to be suspended without pay. That could provide grounds to have the disciplinary cases dismissed and allow the officers to “escape any disciplinary punishment whatsoever,” the board said.

The board’s decision was a response to motions filed by Van Dyke’s lawyer and by a special Cook County prosecutor assigned to look into police actions in the McDonald case. The attorneys argued that the disciplinary statements Van Dyke and the other officers were required to make during the internal investigation may be used as evidence that could affect Van Dyke’s criminal trial.

Under a decades-old legal standard, statements that government employees are forced to give under threat of being fired cannot be used against them in criminal proceedings. Sebastian, Mondragon, Viramontes and Franko have not been charged with any crime. But they are part of an ongoing criminal probe by a special Cook County prosecutor looking into whether there was a cover-up in the shooting.

Chicago police officers accused of criminal wrongdoing are not typically brought up before the police board on disciplinary charges until their court cases are over with. The McDonald shooting case has been an exception.

Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Fraternal Order of Police President Kevin Graham said the board’s decision ensures that the officers will be treated fairly.

“There has been a decadeslong tradition that the Police Department does not file (termination) charges until their criminal cases have been heard,” Graham said. “I hope that these officers can get back to being on the pay status very, very quickly, and certainly I hope that the case winds its way to a successful conclusion.”

Daniel Herbert, Van Dyke’s lawyer, would not comment after the hearing. But lawyers for the other officers were pleased that their clients will be allowed to get paid by the Police Department, at least until the criminal proceedings run their course.

“I’ve been doing this for over 30 years. I’ve never seen the police board tell the superintendent, ‘No, you can’t suspend these guys,'” Tom Pleines, Franko’s lawyer, told reporters. “There’s no doubt they were involved in a very serious matter, but there’s been no determination that they did anything wrong.”

The disciplinary charges before the police board focus largely on alleged dishonesty but varied on specifics among Sebastian, Mondragon, Viramontes and Franko. All are alleged, though, to have violated Rule 14, which bars them from making false reports.

Van Dyke stated in reports that he fired his weapon in fear for his life when McDonald advanced on him with a knife. On the video, however, Van Dyke can be seen jumping from his car and opening fire within seconds as McDonald appears to walk away from him.

Sebastian and Mondragon reported that Van Dyke and his partner, Joseph Walsh, repeatedly ordered McDonald to drop the knife. The teen ignored them as he waved a blade while approaching the two officers, according to what Sebastian and Mondragon stated in police reports.

Viramontes stated that McDonald turned toward Van Dyke and Walsh after Van Dyke told the teen to drop the knife. After Van Dyke shot McDonald, the teen fell to the street but continued to move, trying to get back up with the knife, according to Viramontes’ account in the reports.

The department charged Franko with, among other things, signing off on Van Dyke’s allegedly false reports on the incident.

Craig Futterman, a University of Chicago law professor who helped push for the release of the McDonald video, was disappointed in Monday’s decision, believing the four officers helped try to cover up the shooting and should remain in a no-pay status.

“That’s not a step in the right direction for the Chicago Police Department,” he said.

jgorner@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @JeremyGorner